The Cook County, Illinois, Coyote Project

 

 

     
  The Coyote-Wildlife Relationship 

 

 RELATIONSHIPS WITH OTHER ANIMALS

  • EFFECTS ON OTHER WILDLIFE

  • Relationships with Animals in the Chicago

Unfortunately, most of the information the public receives about urban coyotes comes from newspapers or other media that usually focus on conflicts, such as pet attacks.

However, other aspects of the ecological roles coyotes play in urban areas are poorly understood. Nevertheless, predators, including coyotes, serve important ecological functions, even in metropolitan areas.

EFFECTS ON OTHER WILDLIFE

There has been a recent flurry of studies addressing the relationships between coyotes and other medium-sized predators, such as raccoons, skunks, and foxes. In some cases, these relationships are fairly clear, but for others, there is only speculation.

In rural areas, coyotes often kill red foxes and limit their populations. We know less about this relationship in large, metropolitan areas.

We did not specifically measure fox populations during the 1990s in the Chicago area when the coyote population appeared to increase, but we have conducted recent surveys that indicate both species have declined. This supports the general impressions of most nature-center and park personnel in the area. Some research has suggested that coyotes may limit medium-sized predators that are smaller than coyotes, including raccoons, striped skunks, and opossums.

Although this perception has become quite popular, we have found little evidence that coyotes limit raccoon or skunk populations in urban areas.  In fact, we have explored these relationships in some detail and it appears that coyotes have little impact on mesopredator populations outside of foxes and domestic cats, although we have not tested the possible impact of coyotes on opossums.

Below are a few examples of the impact coyotes may have in urban areas, some of which might be considered positive effects.  This is by no means a thorough list, and as we learn more about the ecological relationships between coyotes and other wildlife, the list of examples will increase.

 

Relationships with Animals in the Chicago Metropolitan Area

Rodents:

Rodents make up the bulk of the coyote diet in both urban areas and rural areas. Although it has yet to be measured in urban systems, experiments in rural areas have shown that the removal of coyotes results in a dramatic increase in rodent abundance and a decrease in rodent diversity (this means that only a few species increase and exclude other rodent species).We have observed rodent increases in areas, such as golf courses, following coyote removal programs. There is also the possibility that coyotes help to control woodchucks.  Many areas, such as cemeteries and golf courses, have reported declines in woodchuck abundance once coyotes appeared.

 

White-Tailed Deer:

Deer are often overabundant and difficult to manage in urban areas. Although coyotes rarely take adult deer, they are primary predators of deer fawns. Colleagues from the Illinois Natural History Survey conducted a fawn survival study in different locations within the Chicago area and found that coyotes killed 20 percent to 80 percent of the fawns in different populations.

Coyotes cannot reduce deer populations because they do not often take adult deer (in the Midwest), but they may slow population growth in high-density areas through their predation on fawns.

 

Canada Geese:

Geese have adapted to urban landscapes much like deer and, at times, become overabundant and a nuisance. Geese can also be a challenge to manage in urban areas. A study of geese in the Chicago area found that the population was growing much less rapidly than predicted, and that population growth was limited by nest predation. By placing modified video cameras at the nests, we were able to identify coyotes as the major predator on the nests.

Thus, coyotes are serving as a biocontrol for urban geese. Because egg contents are not detected in coyote scat, the extent of coyote predation on goose nests could only be determined by placing cameras at nests. 

As with deer, coyotes do not take enough adult geese to reduce the population, but they can slow the population increase through egg predation.

 

Domestic Cat: 

This is perhaps one of the most controversial aspects to the urbanization of coyotes and often pits sections of the public against each other.  Coyotes kill cats for food or to remove them as potential competitors. Those members of the public who own cats or are otherwise interested in their well-being view this function of coyotes as strongly negative.

However, a positive consequence of coyotes removing peri-domestic or feral cats is the trickle-down effect.  Studies in California urban areas showed that coyotes reduced cats in some habitat fragments, which then resulted in an increase in nesting success for songbirds. Thus, the coyote serves as a top predator by removing an important smaller predator, the cat, resulting in birds and perhaps other species subsequently increasing in number.  More research is needed to determine if these trickle-down effects also occur in other metropolitan areas.

 

 

 

 
 

 

The Cook County, Illinois, Coyote Project


The Ohio State University